DietPi Blog

... discover DietPi, Debian and Linux info

Comparison to other Debian based distributions – Why should you use DietPi?

DietPi startet its history more than 6 years ago and has a successful broadband usage in more than 100,000 active systems. There are a couple of other Debian based distributions where the DietPi team did comparisons to. This article describes these statistics.

1. Comparison overview

The comparison data is published on the DietPi statistics page:

DietPi OS comparison page tiles
Navigation on the DietPi statistics page

1.1 Distributions compared to DietPi

The following Debian based distributions were compared:

  • Raspberry Pi OS Lite (32-bit)
  • Raspberry Pi OS Lite (64-bit)
  • Armbian (server image) on ODROID C4
  • Armbian (server image) on NanoPi R2S
  • Armbian (server image) on NanoPi NEO3
  • Debian (server image) on ODROID C4
  • Debian (server image) on x86_64 PC

DietPi users are hereby encouraged to do own comparisons (e.g. on other hardware variants) and publish the results to this blog post, so that we can add further data to the DietPi statistics page. Therefore the comparison commands are given by the first tile “Test commands” and we provide a script to make their execution easy and consistent:

1.2 Comparison attributes

First of all: The DietPi distribution comparison does not claim to be comprehensive. It covers some basic properties but does not give a broadband overall overview. The chosen attributes shall only give an impression of the DietPi benefits, regarding one of our major aims: to be lightweight and performant also on small hardware with little RAM, disk space and CPU power.

The comparison examines the following attributes

1RAM usagebytes
2Running processesnumber of processes
3Disk usagebytes
4Pre-installed packagesnumber of packages
5Boot durationseconds
6Temporary files in RAMyes/no
7Logs in RAMyes/no
8SSH pre-installedyes/no
9Download sizebytes
10Image sizebytes
11Build date
Comparison attributes and units

These comparison attributes (criteria) are explained below: What is the comparison procedure (commands) and what is the relevancy of these KPI values?

1.2.1 RAM usage and Disk usage

Especially the RAM usage in SBC systems with less memory is essential for the overall system speed, because low RAM usage avoids time consuming swapping and gives more available cache memory. The following graphics shows a memory consumption on a X11 based VM with its memory consumption (green arrow) and the cache usage (yellow arrow).

Example htop RAM usage bars on DietPi
Example htop screenshot of DietPi VM system

The disk usage is relevant only with smaller SD cards resp. system disks. It is not a performance killer.

1.2.2 Running processes

The number of running processes contributes to the RAM usage and may also contribute to available computation resources. Another aspect is, that fewer processes means fewer possibly unknown or unexpected system tasks and behaviour, like services listening on network ports and answering to requests, providing information about the system and other tasks.

Example htop process list on DietPi
DietPi base system htop screenshot showing the small number of active tasks

1.2.3 Pre-installed packages

The number of pre-installed packages corresponds directly to the number of running processes and hence memory usage, as well as disk usage.

1.2.4 Boot duration

Fewer system services and processes means fewer boot tasks, so that DietPi usually boots faster than other Debian based distributions.

1.2.7 Temporary files in RAM and Logs in RAM

DietPi aims to be optimised for minimal disk writes, by having temporary files and logs by default stored on a tmpfs RAM drive, which contributes positively to the lifetime of the system drive and performance of operations which involve related writes, especially when the system drive is an SD card.

1.2.8 SSH pre-installed

While it is trivial to install a desktop environment, DietPi aims to be a server system in the first place, and hence needs to be maintainable headless, without a monitor and keyboard physically attached. For this reason the ability to login via SSH is crucial, which is in our case with the lightweight Dropbear SSH server.

1.2.9 Download size and image size

As a result of the low pre-installed package count, DietPi images are naturally small.

2. Comparison results

The results show that our efforts to ship DietPi as a minimal Debian system with low memory and disk usage and low boot times are paying out. There are two cases where DietPi is defeated in single attributes:

  1. Most DietPi images ship with a dedicated FAT /boot partition, which holds the kernel, in case initramfs, boot configuration and DietPi scripts. On Raspberry Pi this is strictly required. It has the benefit that the most important files responsible for system boot can be accessed and in case repaired from any other OS, like Windows or macOS. Same is true for pre-configuring DietPi via dietpi.txt before first boot. The downside is that this partitioning leads to additional empty space in the disk image and cannot be compressed as effective as a single partition image. Debian server image can hence be smaller than DietPi images, even if the actual disk usage is higher.
  2. Debian server images, when using the netboot installer without selecting any additional software, ship without full WiFi support and without common WiFi USB adapter firmware installed. We want DietPi images to have full WiFi support out-of-the-box, which implies additional disk usage especially for a set of firmware packages.
DietPi comparison RAM usage
DietPi comparison running processes
DietPi comparison disk usage
DietPi comparison package count
DietPi comparison boot duration
DietPi comparison download size
OSTemp. files in RAMLogs in RAMSSH pre-installed
Rasp. OS Lite
(32-bit and 64-bit)
Armbian (NanoPi R2S,
(ODROID C4, x86_64 PC)

3. Execute your own comparison

If you want to do an own comparison the used commands are given in the icon “Test commands”.

To generate a comparison just execute a pre-made shell script given there. Therefore edit a script (e.g. with the nano editor: nano, paste the script text into the editor and store it. Afterwards activate the execution flag via the chmod +x <shell_script_name> command (e.g. chmod +x

After this, you can execute the script (e.g. . ./ The script does all measurements and at the end needs a reboot. After the reboot you have to re-execute the script and are then able to read out the resulting values.
To provide consistent results, the script does an initial alignment, full package upgrade and a reboot. On the second run, it performs the actual tests and prints the results.

Remark: You need to run this script on a system which is set to C.UTF-8 or en_GB.UTF-8 (within /boot/dietpi.txt) to get the correct data output: The script filters some keywords which will not be found in other language settings.

Comparison to other Debian based distributions – Why should you use DietPi?

5 thoughts on “Comparison to other Debian based distributions – Why should you use DietPi?

  1. Thank you for the great comparison.

    Is it relatively straightforward to get extra bits working that work out-of-the-box on the normal pi-lite distribution? e.g., to apt-get install the things needed for the newer Pi cameras? Or drivers for 4g dongle?

  2. I think the x86_64 boot time is probably the most frustrating thing there, on Debian it’s more than 3x faster.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to top