Size of disk usage versus dietpi-backup

There is probably a good reason for the difference, but it would be nice to know why :slight_smile:

DietPi v10.1.2 : 14:52 - Sun 02/22/26
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 - Device model : Native PC (x86_64)
 - Kernel : 6.12.73+deb13-amd64
 - CPU temp : 40 °C / 104 °F : Optimal temperature
 - LAN IP : xxx.xxx.xxx.xx (eth0)
 - Disk usage (RootFS) : 399G of 917G (46%)
 - Disk usage (userdata) : 399G of 917G (46%)
 - MOTD : DietPi v10.1 has been released. Check out all changes:
          https://dietpi.com/docs/releases/v10_1/
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────

So disk usage is almost 400GB.

But if I do a complet backup (dietpi-backup) it adds up to 427GB

Torben

My guess is one shows GB and the other GiB.
427 Gigabyte are 397 Gibibyte.

From where did you get the 427 GB?

Maybe that is the diffrent in size.

The 427 “GB” showed up at 99.xx% when doing a complet new backup (dietpi-backup)

Torben