# Orange Pi 5+ should we have switched kernel?

**URL:** https://dietpi.com/forum/t/orange-pi-5-should-we-have-switched-kernel/19929
**Category:** General Discussion
**Created:** [18 April 2024 20:50 UTC](https://dietpi.com/forum/t/orange-pi-5-should-we-have-switched-kernel/19929 "2024-04-18T20:50:04Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 51

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MichaIng](https://dietpi.com/forum/user_avatar/dietpi.com/michaing/32/7_2.png) [@MichaIng](https://dietpi.com/forum/u/MichaIng)
#### Post date: [12 May 2024 19:39 UTC](https://dietpi.com/forum/t/orange-pi-5-should-we-have-switched-kernel/19929/51 "2024-05-12T19:39:58Z")

</div>

Hmm, I tested the vendor kernel on my Orange Pi 5 Plus, and it causes in infinite udev reload loop with persistent 5% CPU usage, due to one HDMI related device: [Orange Pi 5 Plus | Network interface names can swap on reboot · Issue #6592 · MichaIng/DietPi · GitHub](https://github.com/MichaIng/DietPi/issues/6592#issuecomment-2106349735)

While debugging our udev rule which assures fixed Ethernet interface names, the systemd journal was regularly written full and rotated due to the udev log spam.

Do you (anyone) as well see a udev worker process in your `htop` which never settles?

---

_[View the full topic](https://dietpi.com/forum/t/orange-pi-5-should-we-have-switched-kernel/19929)._